At Mabadiliko CIC, we believe that meaningful involvement of communities is crucial for advancing health research and improving outcomes for all. While increasing participation of underrepresented groups in research is important, it’s time to move from mere participation to meaningful and equitable involvement as standard practice in healthcare.
The Democratic Deficit in Healthcare
For too long, decision-making power has been concentrated in the hands of professionals, policymakers, and academics—often far removed from the lived realities of those most affected by health inequalities. This concentration of power creates a democratic deficit with real consequences. When communities lack meaningful influence in healthcare decisions, we see research that fails to address their priorities, services that don’t meet their needs, and persistent health inequalities, particularly for racially minoritised communities. This isn’t just about fairness—it’s about effectiveness. Decision-making divorced from lived experience simply produces less effective results.
The Problem with Tokenistic Engagement
Despite widespread recognition of the need for community involvement, many current approaches remain superficial and tokenistic. These efforts, while often well-intentioned, typically lack meaningful community involvement in how they are designed and implemented. Tokenistic engagement takes many forms:
- One-off consultations after research questions have already been decided
- Advisory groups with limited influence on key decisions
- Community representatives who aren’t sufficiently supported
- Box-ticking exercises designed primarily to satisfy funders
- Failure to compensate community members for their expertise
These approaches not only fail to produce meaningful insights but can actually reinforce existing power imbalances and erode trust between communities and institutions.
Transforming Power Dynamics
Democratising health research through equitable partnerships transforms how research is conducted and how health-related decisions are made. This approach moves beyond tokenistic involvement to genuine co-creation, where communities are recognised as experts in their own right. Creating meaningful partnerships requires working across multiple levels:
- Health System Capacity Building Developing institutional culture that fosters cultural humility and anti-racism within research organisations, including policy development for equitable research practices.
- Community Capacity Building Empowering communities through our Mabadiliko Academy training programmes, transforming them from passive research subjects to active collaborators with the skills to engage effectively.
- Facilitating Genuine Partnership Establishing structured, power-balanced collaborative spaces where all parties work as equals, with appropriate compensation for community expertise and clear pathways for influence.
Looking Forward: From Inclusion to Power-Sharing
True democratisation requires more than just including diverse voices in existing structures—it demands a fundamental redistribution of power. This means creating new structures and processes that enable communities to exercise meaningful influence over decisions affecting their health and wellbeing. By shifting power to those traditionally excluded from decision-making, we can create a health system that truly works for everyone—especially those experiencing the greatest health inequalities. This isn’t just about social justice; it’s about creating better health for all.
Project Highlight
Our work with the Research Engagement Network (REN) Development Programme, delivered in partnership with South East London Integrated Care Board, King’s Health Partners and the NIHR South London Research Delivery Network and Applied Research Collaboration teams demonstrates this power shift in action. As one community partner reflected during the REN project: “Attending the Programme Advisory Partnership meetings has been enriching for me. They provide a platform for open discussion where we can get to know each other on a human level, beyond our roles as researchers or participants. There’s a sense of unity and collaboration, where everyone works together as one team to address the challenges of health inequality.” By establishing structured forums for authentic dialogue and engagement, we’ve created pathways for communities to influence research priorities, methodologies, and interpretation—shifting from passive research subjects to active co-creators of knowledge.
Cultural Humility – Self reflection questions for individuals and organisations:
- How do I maintain power when working with people from different backgrounds?
- When my expertise is challenged by someone with lived experience that contradicts my professional knowledge, how do I respond?
- Where in our processes do we claim to value community input while maintaining control over final decisions?
- How might our funding models, timelines, and success metrics enable or inhibit genuine community co-creation?
Further Reading:
- From Tokenism to Empowerment: Progressing Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare Improvement (Ocloo & Matthews, 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety)
- The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it (Russell, Fudge & Greenhalgh, 2020, Research Involvement and Engagement)
- The Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on UK NHS Health Care: A Systematic Review (Mockford et al., 2012, International Journal for Quality in Health Care)
- Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews | Health Research Policy and Systems (Ocloo, Garfield, Frankly and Dawson, 2021, Health Research Policy and Systems)
Making discussions about equity the norm
Working with you to give the silenced a voice.